Define Class System Of Social Stratification Essay
Show MoreSocial Stratification
A person's class status can be harder to identify than race or ethnic differences. However, I believe class status is an important indicator of what kind of opportunities lie ahead for people in various class systems, although, I don't necessarily agree with the current class structure. Class places people into a type of structure which goes against the principal belief 'that in America all are created equal,' or that even the poorest child can become President some day if he or she applies him/her self. I agree with the argument of Mantsios and Fussell that social class remains largely invisible because our society doesn't want to believe that poverty exists in America. If Americans acknowledged poverty, then…show more content…
Education is one big advantage to unlocking many doors throughout life, and most people beneath the middle class structure don?t have this advantage. This too, can create a ripple effect within its structure which is: unemployment, drugs and alcohol abuse, physical/sexual abuse, homelessness. The remainder of society doesn?t want to hear how poverty can cause tragedy even to the point of one taking one?s own life and the life of their child. What kind of society do we live in that death is the only alternative to poverty? One that wants to keep poverty hidden from the rest of the world hoping it will go away.
The Catholic church is no exception to ?living high on the hog.? We see some of its leaders living in the poshness of society and rubbing elbows with its elite. Even the affluent have their effects on the church (as stated in the following article). Have Catholics no shame? We are only too human when it comes to wanting the best society has to offer. Fortunately, most religious believe in living a simple lifestyle which includes living in common with their brothers or sisters and working among the poor. Religious will never be poor according to society?s definition of poor because community meets all of their needs. When we speak of poverty in religious life, we are referring to gospel poverty, not material poverty. They ask us to live simple lives, own no property, and share everything in common with other members. Gospel
What is social class?
Any observer of American society would quickly note that there are large variations in wealth, material possessions, power and authority, and prestige in our society.They would also note differences in access to education, healthcare and leisure. One child in ten lives in poverty in major industrial countries, one in five in the . Taken together these differences in resources and outcomes are thought of as the basis of inequality.What is the source of this inequality? Some say it is the result of an unequal distribution of resources, power and authority.
What are resources: money, land, assets – distinction made between wealth – monetary value of all own and income – amount of money brought in through wages, investment, etc.
What is power: ability to be in charge, to rule
What is authority: control, particularly in the face of resistance
Are material interests (money, land, assets, etc.) the only basis of inequality? Status represents another form of inequality – standing, esteem, respect, prestige, may involve physical ability, intelligence, beauty, occupations that are ranked in order of prestige – doctors, corporate lawyers, financial experts …to garbage collectors and janitors.
When sociologists talk of social class, they refer to a group of individuals who occupy a similar position in the economic system of production.Within that system occupation is very important because it provides financial rewards, stability and benefits like healthcare. Are people in similar positions, aware of each other? In broad terms, yes.Get information (cues) by type of job, neighborhood, clothing, cars, etc. Also get information by conversation – topics, style, grammar etc.Can people mislead or be misled?Of course. Is there a point of view specific to social class?Middle class values?Working class values?
How many social classes are there in the ?Disagreement within the field on both the number and the composition of these classes. Many sociologists suggest five:
Upper Class – Elite
Represent institutional leadership, heads of multinational corporations, foundations, universities
Capitalist elite – owners of lands, stocks and bonds and other assets – wealth derived from what they own
Forbes magazine publishes a list of the 400 wealthiest families in . In 1997, net worth had to be at least $475 million.Bill Gates, in that year, had net worth pf 39.8 billion. Of all the wealth represented on the Forbes list, more than half is inherited. Newly acquired wealth, nouveau riche, have vast amounts of money but not often accepted into “old money” circles.
Upper Middle Class
Represent scientific and technical knowledge – engineers, accountants, lawyers, architects, university faculty, managers and directors of public and private organizations. Have both high incomes and high social prestige. Well-educated. Difficult to define a “middle class” (i.e. upper middle, middle middle and lower middle) probably the largest class group in the – because being middle class is more that just income, about lifestyles and resources, etc.
Lower Middle Class
Provide support for professionals
Engage in data collection., record-keeping
Paralegals.\, bank tellers, sales
Blue-collar workers in skilled trades
Laborers in factories
Nursing home staff
Repair shops, garages
Working poor – work full-time at wages below poverty line
Social class is one of the most important concepts that sociologists discuss and yet its definition is often illusive.There are two classical sociologists who are most important in the discussions about class – Karl Marx and Max Weber
And what is frustrating about bothis that they did not produce a viable definition of the things that they wrote extensively about
Assertion that there were two great classes – the owners of the means of production (capitalists) and the workers – the only thing that the workers owned was their ability to work, what Marx called “labor power.” Because owners (capitalists) paid wages to workers and could for the most part determine that wage, owners had power over workers.
Marx felt that the lack of power of workers was the source of exploitation and the basis of class conflict.Marx argued that owners and workers developed ideas, understandings about their positions and this Marx called class consciousness. When owners convinced workers that their situations were compatible – Marx called this false consciousness.
Although Marx talked mainly about the two great classes – owners and workers – he was aware as well of a third category which he called petit bourgeoisie – literally little middleclass and these were owners of own small businesses.Finding a location for this group was difficult because they lacked the power if the owners and at the same time had control over their work and wages unlike the workers. Moreover, according to Marx, sometimes they identified with the owners and sometimes with the workers.
Max Weber:1864 - 1920
The other sociologist was Max Weber. He argued that class referred to economic interests. It was a quantifiable economic position – groups that share a common set of life-chances and circumstances. But Weber also talked about status, prestige – important part was awareness of its value. Weber also talked about party – essentially putting the class interests into action.
Erik Wright: Sees much crossover in their positions.In two areas finds difference, the discussion of exploitation (for Marx – labor of worker appropriated, and eventually facing off against each other - for Weber labor and class relations an exchange – voluntary, a compromise) and the view of capitalism.Marx sees capitalism as destructive, (source of class conflict) Weber views it as natural and permanent – over time best means for a given ends – rational).
Why is it important to study class?It is seen is one, perhaps the principal line of social cleavage within society – place where the most serious disturbances and disruptions are thought to be traceable.